Date Center Power Distribution Units
In the quest to become more efficient, an important facet of data center infrastructure that needs special attention is the data center power distribution strategy. With consumption costs and power densities rising, the traditional methods of distributing power to the racks are frequently challenged. Since power usage effectiveness and cooling costs account for a significant portion of a company’s budget, it’s important to examine which approach is right for your facility.
There are five approaches to data center power distribution used in data centers today. 2NSystems can help you choose the best one for your application.
Advantages
- Lower cost components lead to lowest first cost
- Can accommodate unusual and unique physical room constraints
- Greater flexibility in breaker and cable combinations
- Parts can be acquired quickly
Disadvantages
- Custom engineered installation rely on work and skill of electrician, and have increased risk of human error
- Cooling distribution could be affected by cabling restricting high volume air flow
- Environment is not readily changeable
- Tracing and removing cables is difficult due to power cables under the floor or in trays
Usually Used
- Smaller capacity installations and where lowest first cost is a priority</li
- Where IT changes are not likely or frequent</li
- Where there is low density per rack (if cables are in the air plenum)
Advantages
- Greater number of monitoring options than panelboard
- Lower PDU cost than factory-configured or modular PDUs
- Can accommodate unique and unusual physical room constraints
- Allows for more strategic placement when compared to panelboards
- More flexibility is allowed to the electrician in breaker and cable combinations
Disadvantages
- Field-wired designs rely on work and skill of electrician, and have increased risk of human error
- Field-installed components like breakers and cables mean limited warranties
- Cooling distribution could be affected by cabling restricting high volume air flow
- Tracing and removing cables is difficult due to power cables under the floor or in trays
Usually Used
- When low first cost is a priority over factory-configured and modular distribution
- Where there is available floor space, but unique room constraints limit the use of factory or modular designs
- Where IT changes are not likely or frequent; growth of IT done at pod level
- When layout is unknown at the time of specification (actual ratings and lengths are not specified until closer to installation)
Advantages
- Improve reliability and minimize field work by using pre-fabricated breaker and power cable assemblies
- Better prepared for change as load requirements change
- Warranty of entire power distribution system, since components originate in factory
- Ability to accommodate unusual and unique room constraints
- Lower first cost than the modular distribution approach
Disadvantages
- Specific breakers and cable lengths require knowledge of the IT environment early on in the planning cycle
- Higher cost to install new cables and breakers as requirements change vs. modular distribution approaches
- Tracing and removing cables may be difficult due to the large volume overlayed in troughs
- Occupies IT floor space
- Heavier and perhaps costlier shipping weight
Usually Used
- Where data centers plan their future IT at the pod level
- When the data center requires portable equipment due to possibility of future moves
- Where low first cost is a priority and space is not constrained
Advantages
- No IT room footprint, more space is available for IT equipment
- Improved cable tracing and management, distribution cable from plug-in unit located directly above or below IT racks
- Cable inventory reduced
- Improved reliability from tool-less pre-assembled units eliminates field wire cutting and terminating
- Factory designed, tested and integrated components mean system-level warranty of the entire system
- Wider range of capacities available to address greater capacity needs
- Adds, moves and changes are easier because cables are not stacked
Disadvantages
- Height of ceiling could restrict overhead implementation. Space is required above racks (approx. 25″, 0.6 m); raised floor usage constrains underfloor implementation
- Field installation and integration of multiple bus sections necessitates more time and expense; can create unique problems
- If hung above enclosures may interfere with containment systems
- Advance thought of row placement and length required for busway placement
- Bus oversizing is more likely since it is built out on day one
Usually Used
- Where there is constrained IT floor space
- In larger facilities with an open plan and defined row layout
- Where there is a high level of confidence in final load requirement
- Where there is a high turnover rate of IT equipment requiring new circuits
A lot of data center projects involve the upgrading of an existing structure, typically involving the adding of capacity or installing a high-density zone. Floor-mount modular systems are suitable option for retrofit projects such as these, because installation is less disruptive than a traditional PDU. Modular PDUs can exist together with existing, traditional PDUs.
Modular PDUs can be directly integrated with the UPS system of a small data center into a compact arrangement. No separate UPS room required.
However there are some cases where there may be one or more zones within a data center that require only a small number of branch circuits. This can happen where there is a group of very high density racks or when a small group of racks are isolated by the environment shape or other constraint. Where this occurs, there are smaller modular PDUs that can mount directly to the IT rack, consuming zero footprint.
Advantages
- Pre-fabricated backplane and circuit modules promise a well-integrated and reliable system
- Pre-assembled modules require minimal field work
- Better capacity and change management for future load requirement changes
- Factory designed, tested and integrated components mean system-level warranty of entire system
- Easily scale additional PDUs when new IT demands are identified
- Ability to accommodate unusual and unique room constraints
Disadvantages
- Larger number of cables to inventory due to varying distances from PDUs to racks
- Cable tracing, adds, and changes can be difficult due to cable volume and size
- Takes up IT room space
Usually Used
- When flexibility is required to add/move distribution, i.e. uncertain growth plans or locations are not specifically defined in advance
- When the room has constraints in shape or height
- Where IT personnel prefers to reconfigure breakers and circuits without third party involvement
- Where deployment speed is a priority
- When retrofitting existing data centers with additional capacity or installing a high-density zone